Meghan Markle’s efforts to help get out the vote have riled up critics back in the U.K.
Last Thursday, the former actress took part in a virtual “When All Women Vote” event for Michelle Obama’s When We All Vote initiative, during which she urged women to mobilize and spoke out against complacency.
“At this juncture, if we aren’t part of the solution, we’re part of the problem,” the duchess said. “If you’re complacent, you’re complicit. We can make the difference in this election. And we will make the difference in this election.”
As a U.S. citizen now living back in California following her and husband Prince Harry’s break from their senior royal duties earlier this yea, Meghan has been vocal about her intentions to vote in the upcoming presidential election, though she has so far stopped short of endorsing a particular candidate. But her outspokenness about hitting the ballot box has already angered royalists who say it’s inappropriate in light of her duchess status. Though not strictly against the law, it is considered “unconstitutional” for a British monarch (currently Queen Elizabeth II) to vote, while members of the royal family have historically followed her lead and remained apolitical.
As such, Meghan’s passion for exercising her rights to vote have rankled critics like talk show host and longtime detractor Piers Morgan, who responded to her remarks by demanding that her royal titles be stripped.
“They can’t remain as royals and spout off about foreign elections in such a brazenly partisan way,” Morgan, one of the duchess’s most vocal critics, fumed on Twitter.
Morgan’s complaint prompted a four-letter response from Bette Midler, who tweeted “oh f*** off.” Writer and TV creator David Simon of The Wire also came to Meghan’s defense, telling Morgan, “It’s her country. It’s a moral stand. F***your royal a**kissery. F*** your rule book..”
To this, Morgan replied, “Pipe down you silly man. If Ms. Markle wants to make a real moral stand, I suggest she gives up her duchess title, and her father-in-law’s money, and stands on her own two feet. Her shocking disrespect for the queen and the monarchy, and the royal ‘rule book,’ is outrageous.”
He went on to call Simon a “disrespectful little twerp.”
Jameela Jamil also stood up for Meghan, replying to a tweet from Dan Wootton in which the executive editor of Britain’s Sun tabloid accused her of “actively campaigning against Donald Trump” and called the former Suits star “completely inappropriate.” (The duchess is embroiled in a lawsuit against the owners of The Sun.)
Jamil retorted that the royals would “be more embarrassed” by Prince Andrew’s entanglement in the Jeffrey Epstein scandal than “an American supporting women voting in her own country, and loosely referencing the importance of general democracy which is being threatened here currently. “
In a follow-up tweet, the British actress called Meghan a “terrifying threat to patriarchy” who was subject to more criticism because of her race.
During her appearance at the “When All Women Vote” event, Meghan also reflected on the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment, and its limitations.
“This week we are recognizing the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment, which of course gave women the right to vote, but not all women,” she noted. “And specifically not women of color. As we look at things today, though it had taken decades longer for women to get the right to vote, even today we are watching so many women in different communities, who are marginalized, still struggling to see that right to come to fruition. It’s just simply not OK.
Read more from Yahoo Entertainment:
Cher protests USPS cuts: ‘Hey Senate! Snap out of it’
‘Young & Restless’ star Melody Thomas Scott talks stabbing Clint Eastwood, almost becoming Marcia Brady
Sean Penn says ‘new bride’ Leila George ‘pushes’ him to be ‘a better person’
Source: Read Full Article