Conor McGregor brands ex-pal Artem Lobov a ‘f***ing idiot’ as he crows over court win amid Proper No12 Whiskey lawsuit | The Sun

CONOR MCGREGOR branded his former pal Artem Lobov a "f***ing idiot" after winning a court battle against the ex-fighter.

Lobov filed a multi-million lawsuit against McGregor claiming he played a significant role in the creation of Proper No. Twelve Whiskey.

McGregor, 34, founded the whiskey brand in 2018 before selling it for £500million in 2021 and had denied Lobov's allegation.

And after a court verdict found in his favour he took to social media to insult Lobov, labelling him a "rat".

McGregor wrote on Twitter: "Artem you little jonny head, unlucky the other day in court, Proper Twelve day, but what did you expect?

"I want them court fees the judge awarded me also. Need them pal.

READ MORE ON SPORT

White ‘doesn’t know’ McGregor return date as he shoots down comeback bout

Most popular Christmas slot games 2022 — check out our top 10 favourite slots

"F***ing idiot.

"I'm not paying these lawyers nothing. Little rartem is.

"The business genius with his college degree. F***ing jack… it's deeper than the dough for me. Put it on me box."

Lobov, 36, is now set to sue McGregor for a second time, alleging the Irishman embarked on “a concerted social media barrage” with the intent of harassing, intimidating and defaming him.

Most read in MMA

POOL PARTY

Paige VanZant sends fans wild in swimsuit as she teases she’s ‘up to no good’

THOR LOSER

Watch Game of Thrones star Thor get 'humbled BADLY' by wrestler half his size

RETURN OF THE MAC

White 'doesn't know' McGregor return date as he shoots down comeback bout

'SO IMPORTANT'

UFC star Ian Garry honoured to be part of Gloves Not Gunz youth initiative

CASINO SPECIAL – BEST NEW CUSTOMER SIGN UP DEALS

Lobov also alleged McGregor’s father Tony sought to harass him via Instagram.

The shock allegations came to light via the Commercial Court, with Lobov saying the pair’s alleged actions are subject of further proceedings, “not least for defamation”.

Source: Read Full Article